Tuesday 31 August 2010

THEIR PAST ... OUR FUTURE?

http://subrosa-blonde.blogspot.com/2010/08/wee-bit-of-history-before-we-become-it.html?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+blogspot%2FbUee+%28SUBROSA%29

And this isn't  even a BRITISH nationalist website.People are gradually noticing what we already know for certain. Maybe not our future after all then?.




There is one God looking down on us all,
We are all the children of one God
The sun, the darkness, the winds,
are all listening
to what we have to say.
- Geronimo


A Wee Bit of History Before We Become It

Since the 1500s America has been colonised (invaded) by the white man, and all the colours of the rainbow, since. The original owners of the country at first were relatively friendly until the incomers started throwing their weight about. The mistake the Amerindians made was that by the time they realised what was happening, they were a minority in their own land, militarily inferior, their religion and beliefs and way of life ridiculed and trashed by the incomers who knew and would allow no way but their own. And as there were more incomers, there were more and more children, so the Amerindian was suddenly a minority and no longer able to fight for what was stolen from him.

The Australian Aborigine had very similar treatment. Again, no chance of winning against heavy fire power, he, like the Amerindian at the start, didn't have any and by the time he did, all of a sudden he is perceived to be a threat and given no mercy. His way of life, religion and beliefs were also stolen from him.

So now we see a similar thing happening in Britain and it seems to be well on the way in the U.S.A.

Here it appears to be an invasion of people from Islamic countries. Parts of England are turning into Islamic no-go areas and these people bring in customs that are anathema to the natives. The numbers of them who seem not to understand the concept of rule of law is astounding, how many now coming here do so because the countries they are leaving would have given them swift severe punishment if they had stayed. And when they transgress out laws we cannot send them back because, basically, they might be punished, some of them deservedly so, for crimes/actions taken before they hastily departed.

We cannot send them back because of a diktat from a foreign administration.

We already no longer control our own country.

Our elected leaders gave control of our country to an Unelected Self Appointed Administration.

An administration that makes laws that allow extradition of native born Britons to other countries in the EU, for minor crimes or things which are not crimes in Britain and without any evidence of crime presented. How long before other administrations will be coming here to arrest citizens directly? It is suggested less than ten years.

But we cannot send back criminals and illegal immigrants to their own countries because they could be ill treated.

Does the indigenous natives of these Island have no human rights?

Notice how many of these immigrants are in the governing of this country as a ratio of their numbers here. It seems quite high?

Notice how much the Main Stream Media promotes so-called minorities against the indigenous peoples.

Notice how many councils give help to incomers to this country before they help the native Britons and note how often it is abused.

We can take back our country but it will require a complete change of attitude by this government, or a complete change of government. It will also require the people to waken up to what is happening around them, and very quickly, otherwise we will be in the situation of the Amerindians and it will be too late. Curry will be the national dish, not roast beef.

If we do not learn from history we will be doomed to relive it.
Morg.

TONY BLAIR TO RETIRE TO THE CARIBBEAN

"Last week, it emerged that he had acquired his ninth property, which will be used by his daughter Kathryn and it was reported yesterday that he was seeking a Caribbean retirement home.

He is thought to have earned (STOLE ?) tens of millions of pounds advising banks and wealthy investment funds since leaving office in 2007."

And look at the state of the Banks.

His advisors are also a bit worried about his future book signing in London, due to the huge drop in Blair popularity in this country and the amount of people who want to LYNCH HIM and /or arrest him for WAR CRIMES.

I wonder why ?


Tony THE WAR CRIMINAL Blair has fucked this country up so much that he's too afraid to spend his old age in the country he ruined.
Not content with forcing MULTICULT on the Indigenous population, Blair has decided that he and his EVIL MOUTH, I mean WIFE have decided that they will buy a Retirement home in the Caribbean.
What's up Tony too scared to live in the country which you have turned into a Third world CRIME country ?
Or maybe you know the trouble coming to this country from Irish Republicans, Islam and the Civil war which you and NEW LABOUR will be held responsible for.
Or are you afraid to live in a Country which has a BRITISH NATIONAL GOVERNMENT and who would impose the DEATH PENALTY FOR TREASON which would see you and the rest of the New Labour TRAITORS hanging from the lamposts of Westminister ?

Whichever way were happy to see the back of the TRAITOROUS GAYBOY BLAIR.

Monday 30 August 2010

FILTHY FOREIGN LUCRE

The news that thousands of council houses have been allocated to foreigners confirm what we have known all the time in spite of the denials of the governments and their subterfuges in putting these undeserving recipients into different categories to deny their presence.
These houses were built for our people, not for the rest of the world. THEY ARE OURS and should ONLY house Brits.
When every British family has a decent home we could think about it but that time is far in the future.


It is an illustration of the contempt in which the ruling elite hold the British people and voters.
Foreign aid ring fencing, the EU and illegal wars are other instances which do not have the support of our people.
That there is no difference is shown by the fact that the Limp Dems joined the Tories in a coalition rather than Labour only because of a mathmatical calculation. If Labour had gained another 10 seats we would have had a Lib lab coalition.
So much for the difference between the parties.

In a REAL democracy the elected majority party reflects the views and wants of the people who elected them.
We, who vote for these parties should have our views reflected in their policies, but that is not the case neither has it been the case for many years now.
Why is that?

Well you only have to look at those who have the most clout in the establishment parties.
In the last two days we have had instances of two wealthy donors to Tory coffers, both non dom non taxpayers and whose wealth has been made at the expense of our country rather than contributing to its prosperity.

Hedge fund boss Jon Wood, a resident of Monaco and a hedge fund boss (that's a useful job) gave £500,000 to the Tories after getting on the electoral roll two weeks before making his donation.

Today we learn that an American hedge fund billionaire Louis Bacon gave the Tories £250,000.
No doubt his lawyers will be able to show that this is all above board but then it's surprising what money can do.

And then we have the £55,000 fromAbdul Majid Jafar who is "usually" resident in the United Arab Emirates.

We have not even got to the other donors of dubious provenance, there are many more, nor the equally dubious foreign supporters of Labour.

Why should this matter?
Because these businessmen have not got where they are (to quote Reggie Perrin) by giving money expecting no return.

They expect and will get lax tax regimes for tax exiles, free movement of capital people and assets and an effectual rape of our people and culture by infusing our political elite with the fruits of their ill gotten gains.
If our country is destroyed it does not bother them, they will have their money, but the people who foolishly voted this shower in have no money and thus no say.
AND THEY CALL THIS DEMOCRACY?

We are as a country being taken over by foreign millionaires with no interest in us apart from using us as a milch cow to suck dry.

Hitler tried to invade us by force and was beaten with many Germans slain in the attempt.
If he had been cleverer he could have used the methods used by these non doms and BOUGHT the elite rather than fought us, and we would now be speaking German.

An equivalent danger or worse faces us now. Nazism was a horror but so is islam with its beheadings and stonings, and the danger of our succumbing to it now is greater than it was in 1940 to Hitler, and it will be done secretly by the power of money and fertility, and unfortunately our present leaders are actively complicit in this treachery.

Perhaps the Electoral Commission should concentrate their efforts in tracing these £millions of donations to the other parties from dubious foreign sources rather than challenging our measly £1.6 million given by the ordinary BRITISH taxpaying people to our party in an effort to save our country from these crooks.

But then who controls the contollers?

BE PROUD TO BE WHITE

I had to edit this, and move it from its original loation after an error was pointed out to me (thanks Jack). Technically this applies to America ... but it applies here too.

Be Proud To Be White..
I have been wondering about why Whites are racists, and no other race is......

Someone finally said it. How many are actually paying attention to this?
There are African Americans, Mexican Americans, Asian Americans, Arab Americans, etc.
And then there are just Americans.. You pass me on the street and sneer in my direction.
You call me 'White boy,' 'Cracker,' 'Honkey,' 'Whitey,' 'Caveman'... And that's OK...
But when I return the favour You call me a racist.
You say that whites commit a lot of violence against you....
So why are the ghettos the most dangerous places to live?
You have the United Negro College Fund. You have Martin Luther King Day.
You have Black History Month.
You have Cesar Chavez Day.
You have Yom Hashoah.
You have Ma'uled Al-Nabi.
You have the NAACP.
You have BET....
If we had WET (White Entertainment Television), we'd be racists.
If we had a White Pride Day, you would call us racists.
If we had White History Month, we'd be racists.
If we had any organization for only whites to 'advance' OUR lives, we'd be racists.
We have a Hispanic Chamber of Commerce, a Black Chamber of Commerce, and then we just have the plain Chamber of Commerce.
Wonder who pays for that??
A white woman could not be in the Miss Black American pageant, but any colour can be in the Miss America pageant.
If we had a college fund that only gave white students scholarships... You know we'd be racists.
There are over 60 openly proclaimed Black Colleges in the US ..
Yet if there were 'White colleges', that would be a racist college.
In the Million Man March, you believed that you were marching for your race and rights.
If we marched for our race and rights, you would call us racists.
You are proud to be black, brown, yellow and orange, and you're not afraid to announce it.
But when we announce our white pride, you call us racists.
You rob us, car jack us, and shoot at us.
But, when a white police officer shoots a black gang member or beats up a black drug dealer running from the law and posing a threat to society, you call him a racist.
I am proud...... But you call me a racist.
Why is it that only whites can be racists??
There is nothing improper about this e-mail..
Let's see which of you are proud enough to send it on.
I sadly don't think many will.
That's why we have LOST most of OUR RIGHTS in this country.
We won't stand up for ourselves!

BE PROUD TO BE WHITE!

It's not a crime YET.... But getting very close!
It is estimated that ONLY 5% of those reaching this point in this e-mail, will pass it on.

Morg.

Sunday 29 August 2010

A GOVERNMENT HEALTH WARNING TO THOSE WISHING TO TRAVEL TO PAKISTAN

TO THOSE OF AN ISLAMIC BENT - PLEASE AVERT EYES NOW SO AS NOT TO BE OFFENDED.


Nicked from BOLTON PATRIOT

ANTI FASCISM IS THE NEW FASCISM

ANTI FASCISM IS THE NEW FASCISM

by Dr Aidan Rankin

When I hear the word 'fascist', I do not think of the assorted pub bores or the few full-blooded bigots who are the stereotypical activists of the 'far right'. Nor do I think of half-drunk, testosterone-driven skinheads in tight-fitting jeans or combat trousers, bawling out anti-immigrant slogans richly spiced with obscenity. Least of all do I think of the thousands of disgruntled Labour supporters, ordinary men and women in working class enclaves, who have given the British National Party its newfound electoral clout. None of these people are fascists, in any meaningful sense of the word. They are victims rather than aggressors - victims of failed liberal social experiments, heartless economic programmes and, above all perhaps, of betrayal by a Labour movement that was set up specifically to defend them.

The left, and many bien pensant liberals and Tories with them, would like us to visualise fascists as aggrieved, poorly educated working class whites - white males in particular, since they are a double negative for the Politically Correct. Such progressives (as they invariably call themselves) use accusations of racism and fascism as excuses to bully and oppress impoverished white communities and isolate them in racially based ghettos. For white liberals, anti-racism becomes a form of auto-racism, directed at members of their own race who are deemed to be socially inferior. It is, in other words, a new type of snobbery and social exclusion. Likewise, the true heirs to fascism are not skinheads, bigots, or BNP-voting former socialists. They are the BNP's sworn enemies, the 'anti-fascist' shock troops of the left, whose slogans of contrived defiance, melodramatic gesture politics and emotional blackmail reach far beyond the Marxist coteries where they originate.

At Burnley, where the BNP made its strongest local government gains this year, the paradox of anti-fascism was apparent in a demonstration by the Anti-Nazi League, images of which were widely disseminated in the press. Piously anti-racist and inclusive, the protesters were overwhelmingly white and middle-class. Proclaiming the virtues of tolerance, their eyes shone with the purity of hatred that is the prerogative of extremists the world over. In that almost archetypal left-wing demo, the chants and clenched fists of the scruffy young men, the screams and hot tears of the even scruffier women, the banners calling for political parties to be suppressed (in the name of tolerance, presumably) expressed something larger than a Lancastrian quirk. For anti-fascists base their campaigns on a sense of outrage that anyone, anywhere should dare to disagree with them. In their appeal to feeling over reason, force over argument, such activists resemble most those phantom Nazis they are claiming to 'fight'. This is why, in a stroke of post-modern irony, anti-fascism is the new fascism.

There is, in British - and especially English - political culture, a rich vein of sentimental radicalism, to which anti-fascist slogans appeal. It is from this section of politics and society that anti-fascist campaigners derive emotional (and, crucially, financial) support. Unlike working class communities, they do not see the violent, arrogant face of anti-fascism, any more than most of Germany's Mittelstand witnessed directly the violence of the Brownshirts. This strand of radical thought, ironically, has its origins in the imperial epoch, amongst a burgeoning middle class influenced strongly by evangelical Christianity, which believed that it had a duty to 'save' benighted natives. The missionary impulse usually placed concern for the Empire's subject peoples, and their material or spiritual well-being, well above concern for the indigenous working class. Typical of such philanthropists is Mrs Jellyby in Dickens's Bleak House, whose eyes 'had a curious habit of looking seeming to look a long way off, as if they could see nothing nearer than Africa'. Like many a modern liberal, Mrs Jellyby neglected those around her, including notoriously her own children. Her thoughts were directed instead towards the (fictitious) African possession of Borrioboola Gha and her idealistic plans for its 'development'.

The world of Non-Governmental Organisations is replete with Mrs or 'Ms' Jellybys. But in a post-colonial age, the phenomenon of immigration has brought their concerns closer to home. Today's Ms Jellyby is just as likely to work for the race relations unit of a local authority as for a Third World NGO. For 'ethnic minority communities' have become the new Borrioboola Gha. They are to be patronisingly helped and pitied, even given special rights, but their members are not to be treated as individuals and the reality of their cultures is to be ignored or scorned. As the white liberal person's burden, the black or brown skinned citizen is supported as long as he reads from a Politically Correct script and shows gratitude and obeisance to those pressure groups that 'care' about him. It is into this Jellyby Syndrome, a legacy of the missionary age, that anti-fascist groupings successfully tap. Guilt-ridden liberals confuse the violent cant of anti-fascism with humanitarian concern, much as the violent cant of fascism was once confused with appeals to tradition and order.

But the missionary impulse does not end with ethnic minorities. In anti-fascist campaigns, there are vestiges of earlier evangelical missions, aimed at the indigenous population, with a view to controlling and pacifying it. Working class communities are treated by anti-fascists, and their liberal apologists, as benighted white tribes to be civilised and subdued. The evangelical fervour present in anti-fascism accounts for the lachrymose quality of its activists, whose tearful appeals are often a prelude to acts of violence or demands for censorship. This is a characteristic they share with fascists, who were the most emotional and least reasoning of political campaigners. Like evangelical temperance campaigners of a bygone age, anti-fascists appear to be trying to save working class people from themselves. Their particualrism, expressed through opposition to large-scale immigration, is labelled as 'racism' and treated as a new form of vice. Their patriotic gut instincts, and their wish to preserve the traditional character of their neighbourhoods, are dismissed as ignorant prejudices, from which white working class men and women must be emancipated just as their forebears were emancipated from drink.

Like evangelicals, anti-fascists seek to liberate by a combination of moral pressure and legal force. Anti-fascism is, however, a radical secular ideology that allows no possibility of repentance or absolution. The evangelical Protestants who joined temperance or anti-vice campaigns were often oppressive and insensitive, but their zeal was frequently held in check by a concern for individual souls. Anti-fascists, by contrast, have no such concerns. They seek to save communities, by changing their collective consciousness or forcing them to conform. Their ideology allows for no concern for individuals, except for attack or denunciation. This contempt for the individual, the white, male worker in particular, allows the anti-fascist to reconcile two contradictory demands - for civil disobedience (including violence) and for the massive extension of state power.

Anti-fascist propaganda makes frequent address to the history and mythology of the left, to which the movement volubly lays claim. Searchlight, anti-fascism's house journal, make frequent reference to the Spanish Civil War, carrying photographs of heroic resistance fighters and carrying interviews with stalwarts of the International Brigade, now elderly and impressive. Other photographs evoke the memory of 'The Battle of Cable Street' and similar events where in the 1930s when working class Jewish communities stood up to the Blackshirt followers of Oswald Mosley's British Union of Fascists. There is in these images an explicit and false assumption of continuity. It is false because in both the Spanish Civil War and Cable Street, a high level of working class self-organisation was involved, and with it a genuine aspiration towards a just society.

Searchlight, by contrast, bases most of its activities on accusation, smear and incitement to hatred - often class hatred directed at working class racists. This was not always so. Its founder, Maurice Ludmer, was a thoughtful ex-Communist Party member for whom the education of working class communities was important, and who believed in freedom and dignity for individuals of all backgrounds. Anti-fascist campaigners today, including Searchlight, refuse to concede to their opponents - especially working class opponents - any sense of human dignity. Working class racists are described routinely as scum or products of the sewer, in a curious echo of the Nazis' twisted denunciations of Jews and other 'enemies' of the Volk. Searchlight still, on occasion, carries intelligent, thoughtful commentaries, especially on events abroad, but in its refusal to compromise with or attempt to win over its opponents, it perpetuates conflicts of a social and racial character.

This latter attribute it shares with the Anti-Nazi League, which is far more explicit in its advocacy of violence and its hatred of the white working class. At one level, the ANL sets itself up as a secular missionary organisation for anti-fascism. At another, its overwhelmingly bourgeois or petty bourgeois activists set out to create an atmosphere of intimidation and violence when they descend on areas such as Burnley. Like a fascist movement, the ANL is explicitly committed to the abolition of free speech. Its activities make it the heir less of the Cable Street battlers and more of the BUF interlopers. Like the Blackshirts, ANL protesters assume the 'right' to descend on working class areas, threaten and harass their inhabitants, incite and engage in violence.

The Anti-Nazi League is linked intimately to the Socialist Workers Party, the best known and most aggressive far left faction in British politics since the demise of orthodox Communism. Unlike the Communist Party, the SWP is opposed to the parliamentary road to socialism and advocates violent revolution. The SWP worldview regards all existing political institutions as outgrowths of 'capitalism'. Neither capitalism itself, nor its institutions, can be 'patched up' or 'reformed'. The party's struggle, therefore, is as much against 'reformist ideas and leaders' as against the capitalist economy:

The state machine is a weapon of capitalist class rule and therefore must be smashed. The present parliament, army, police and judges cannot simply be taken over and used by the working class. There is, therefore, no parliamentary road to socialism.

This rhetoric of class warfare disguises a critique of parliamentary rule identical to that of the Italian Squadristi, Mussolini's foot soldiers who closed the Italian parliament and installed a fascist state. To Mussolini, parliamentary rule was so corrupt - and, indeed, 'bourgeois', that it could not be patched up. The fascist ideal of the Corporate State was based on representation by trade. This policy finds strong echoes in the SWP, which seeks to replace Parliament with a series of 'workers councils'. It also resembles the modern anti-fascist obsession with group rights, whereby racial minorities (and all 'oppressed communities') are represented collectively by activist pressure groups that claim to speak for them. Whilst resembling fascist politics, the SWP's position differs dramatically from that of Marx, who especially in his later years strongly favoured the parliamentary road. Even Lenin, who was always a pragmatist, believed in the use of any expedient institutions, including parliaments. In ultra-left groupuscles he saw only an 'infantile disorder'.

Another far left faction that has had a seminal influence on the anti-fascist movement is the International Marxist Group (IMG), whose luminaries included Tariq Ali. Long defunct now, the IMG played an important role in the student agitation and violent demonstrations of the late 1960s, many of which called to mind the behaviour of young Stormtroopers in the colleges of Weimar Germany. Crucially, the IMG rejected the white working class as hopelessly reactionary and saw the new revolutionary elite as students, ethnic minorities and feminist women. The ideology and tactics and ideology of anti-fascism today owe much to the IMG's profoundly anti-working class and anti-white prejudices.

These far left groups have based their politics on interpretations of Trotsky's 'permanent revolution', a purist doctrine of continual change akin to that of Mao's Cultural Revolution - and Hitler's Third Reich. To the Fuhrer, the Nazi 'revolutionary creative will' had 'no fixed aim, … no permanency, only eternal change'. On the left, anti-fascism has risen to prominence at precisely the time when socialism lacks permanency and continuity, whether as an ideal or a practical programme. In their strident emotionalism and ritualistic denunciation of opponents, anti-fascist campaigns act as a substitute for a coherent left-wing ideology. The same was true of fascist movements, which aimed to replace the left by appealing to more basic psychological impulses of fear, envy and hatred.

Anti-fascism shares with its alleged opposite a belief in the cleansing or redemptive power of violence. They share as well an obsessive preoccupation with race. Indeed it could be said that organisations like Searchlight and the ANL do more than even the BNP to keep racial awareness alive. Both fascism and anti-fascism are uncompromisingly modernist movements, concerned with narrow categorisation and so unsuited to a post-modern age of complexity and permutation. Searchlight, for example, was horrified when some Hindu and Sikh community workers refused to be classified alongside Muslims as 'Asians'. Here were ethnic minorities daring to defy the pressure group definitions. In reality, the violence and nihilism of anti-fascist activists are almost laughably remote from the conservatism of most ethnic minority populations.

It is easy, and tempting at times, to dismiss anti-fascism as a peripheral fringe interest, irrelevant to our lives and thoughts. However its crocodile-tear appeals are in some ways more effective than those of the more traditional far left. Anti-fascists claim to be opposing a political evil. In so doing, they evoke memories of that evil and the wrong done to millions of our fellow human beings. Many people of good will, therefore, fail to see that they are being manipulated. This is why ritual denunciations and balkanising 'group rights' are in danger of pervading public life. The subjectivist definition of a racist incident in the MacPherson Report - any incident that the victim or anyone else 'perceives' as racist - has all the totalitarian characteristics of anti-fascism, yet few dare to describe it as totalitarian for fear that they might be smeared as 'racist'. Likewise, the attempts of New Labour apparatchiks to unearth political 'information' about the Paddington rail crash survivors had all the furtive and perverse instincts of a Searchlight campaign. Such influences have touched conservative politics as well. In the interests of inclusiveness, the Tories tend increasingly towards reverse discrimination and group rights, forgetting that many black and Asian people want freedom from racial politics.

Anti-fascism, like its fascist precursor, is primarily anti-human and misanthropic. It despises its supposed constituents as much as its sworn enemies, and has a vested interest in promoting racial conflict. When we recognise that fascists and anti-fascists are as one, their rhetoric of hatred will lose its power.

THE TRUTH ABOUT COMMUNISM AND THE COMMUNIST UAF





On the 90th October Revolution´s Anniversary, this documentary presents the violent rise of the Soviet Empire from the Chaos of revolution to the terror of the Cold War and is charted using remarkable footage of actual events. Special interest is the subject of the Spanish Revolution. This is the bestcollection of historical film footage on the topic of CommunistImperialism ever assembled. Featuring an introduction from Alexander Kerensky President of Russia following the Revolution that deposed the Czar Regime and before the Communist took over.

Narrator: Ronald Reagan Year: 1962

-----------------------------
And the UAF are RABID COMMUNISTS.
Would you support a VIOLENT RACIST IDEOLOGYsuch as COMMUNISM, which, for it's violent tendencies is on a par with the worst excesses of NAZISM ?
Do you support a group that's espouses VIOLENCE against their POLITICAL ENEMIES ?
DO YOU SUPPORT THE BRITISH HATING UAF ?

WATCH MARTIN SMITH OF THE SWP AND UAF AS HE OPENLY SHOWS HIS HATRED FOR OUR COUNTRY AND IT'S FLAG.





DO YOU WANT SHARIA LAW IMPOSED ON BRITAIN ?

THE VIOLENT MARTIN SMITH OF THE SWP (SOCIALIST WORKER PARTY) AND UAF
DOES.

UAF Thug and Trade Unionist Martin Smith on Trial for Assaulting Police Officer

Don’t you just love the UAF?

They campaign against the ‘fascist’ and ‘racist’ British National Party (at least that is what they say about us) and repeat the mantra, telling people we are violent skinheads who bring hatred and division between communities, and that we must be stopped by any means possible, but who has just hit the headlines for threatening behaviour, and violent attacks against anyone who disagrees with them and their bully boys tactics?


http://www.londonpatriot.org/2010/08/26/uaf-thug-and-trade-unionist-martin-smith-on-trial-for-assaulting-police-officer/

Click on link for story from LONDON PATRIOT.

THE UAF SUPPORTERS OF VIOLENT COMMUNISM

Thanks to UKTABLOID -



The questions that need to asked is, how can far left extremists seemingly get away with murder in modern day Britain? Why can they roam free from government oppression and media scutiny? Why are they supported by all the main political parties?

Well if you follow the money, you'll often find that militant radical leftist organizations such as "anti-fascist" groups are funded by ultra-globalists like George Soros, the Ford Foundation, the Tides Foundation, the Rockefeller Foundation, etc. But why?

First off, let me state that most so-called "anti-fascists" are generally seeking:
- Trotskyism (ie. a borderless world based on global Marxism)
- Intermixing of all races in which everyone will supposedly have respect for one another
- Destroying nationalism by destroying the very concept of a nation-state (this is part of Trotskyism)

Of course such goals amount to silly utopianism and can NEVER be realized. However, in working towards such goals, anti-fascists do much of the "trenchwork" towards:
- breaking down national borders
- promoting massive non-white immigration into the Western world (which acts as a nation-wrecking force)
- promoting multiculturalism (which eventually tears a nation apart from within)

So the reason for the anti-fascist movements seemingly having a licence to kill, is that they and the NWO have a common Globalist goal, but what the "useful idiots" of the UAF don't realise is that the International Bankers are using them for their own ends and will rule supreme in a global dictatorship favourable only to the elites, not the people.

---------------------------------------


Saturday 28 August 2010

Thieving Filthy Bastards

The Greater Manchester Police yesterday released information in relation to the disgraceful theft of two flag poles that where attached to the War Memorial at Leigh Cenotaph.

No doubt to defuse any potential angry backlash from the local population, the GMP only saw fit to disclose the news yesterday, even though this heinous crime was committed over a fortnight ago.

Reports come via the (left click here) Leigh Journal, here in Bolton and the BBC webpage in addition to making the news reports on local radio stations.

The above picture (albeit not uploaded fully for some reason?) was taken whilst at the Leigh Cenotaph at last years Remembrance Day service.

I for one know that we have a hell of a lot of individuals living in that locality of the Cenotaph who have no allegiance whatsoever to our fallen or indeed this Town and Country in general and who certainly wouldn't and couldn't give a rats arse to whom they may upset if it means making a good few quid.
These dirty thieving bastards are no-doubt the same dirty thieving bastards that use hooked rods to fish out the clothing from the 'charity' bins a couple of streets away as well!

Friday 27 August 2010

HAAAA HAHAHAHAHAHA

Legal Aid refused

Click for article.

... but who pays the cost of the application so far?

LISA NANDY LETS THE CAT OUT OF THE BAG.

Labour MP: Members Too Thick To Vote

Who was it that said Labour MPs were patronising and nannying? Lisa Nandy, the uninspiring member for Wigan, is complaining that the system for electing the new leader is too confusing for the members to understand:
“I am picking up a disconcerting level of confusion amongst party members about when they vote or how the system works. The preference system that the Labour Party uses has its advantages, but it also makes it hard for people to understand the eventual result.”
Guido has oft thought there must be certain intellectual cut off point for members of the Labour Party, but he didn’t realise it was quite that low. So Ms. Nandy will be voting against AV then?

CONTRAST THAT AGAINST THIS:

Mosque launches appeal in Wigan

 http://www.wigantoday.net/news/mosque_launches_appeal_in_wigan_1_1310218

 

COULDN'T HELP MYSELF

Found this at Jack da Rippa's place

http://thelunaticarms.wordpress.com/

I know I shouldn’t but still…

Man knocked on my door last night seeking donations for the Pakistani floods.

I said “sure, there’s the hose, help yourself”.

 

 

Thursday 26 August 2010

FOR SALE - CONSERVATIVE MINISTERS £1000 A TIME

The Conservatives have been accused of offering businessmen access to ministers in return for cash.

Wealthy supporters have been invited to enjoy "fine wines and superb food" with senior figures during the party's conference in Birmingham in September.

Tickets are on sale at £500 and each table will include a "prominent Conservative MP".

Chancellor George Osborne is set to be the guest of honour at the first Conservative Party Business Dinner.

The Tories have defended the event and said both Labour and the Liberal Democrats hold similar fundraisers.

"Under the current system, events to raise money are vital to pay for the running of the party, as they always have been for all political parties," a party spokesman said.

But Sir Alistair Graham, a former chairman of the committee on standards in public life, told the Daily Telegraph: "If you're trying to set a high moral tone, this sort of thing is unwise.

"Governing parties need to be very careful about their fund-raising.

"The public reacts very strongly to the idea that you can buy influence with government."

Telegraph reporter James Kirkup, who broke the story, told Sky News the Tories were in danger of not living up to their promise to introduce a "new politics".

http://news.sky.com/skynews/Home/Politics/Conservatives-Accused-Of-Cash-For-Access-Over-Conference-Business-Dinner/Article/201008415707057?lpos=Politics_Second_UK_News_Article_Teaser_Region_1&lid=ARTICLE_15707057_Conservatives_Accused_Of_Cash_For_Access_Over_Conference_Business_Dinner

_____________________

WE CANNOT TRUST ANY OF THE MAIN THREE POLITICAL PARTIES TO REPRESENT US.

The only people they represent are the LOBBYISTS and MULTI-MILLIONARE BUSINESS MEN, who will be lobbying for their own needs and not the COUNTRY nor its PEOPLE.

Do you think if we went to lobby our MPs that we would be allowed anywhere near them. Well, only if you can afford a GRAND a time.

The people that matter are ignored for the LOBBYISTS of BIG BUSINESS and FOREIGN DONORS.


Further proof, if needed, that the Lib/Lab/Con will sell our country from under us, isn't it about time we started to FIGHT BACK ?

AS THICK AS THIEVES

After last years MPs expenses scandal certain MPs are still unhappy about not being able to thieve even more from the taxpayers due to changes brought in to curb any further abuses of MPs expenses (theft of taxpayers money).

How many times did we hear the thieving MPs claim that they had not done anything wrong but would give the money back after being outed for putting in fraudulent claims and pocketing the money.

How many have been taken to court ? Only a handful. All the others were allowed to pay back the stolen funds and sidestepped a visit from the Police and a day in court. How many ordinary brits who have been caught with their 'hand in the till' were allowed to pay back their ill-gotten gains and be told to go home and be a good boy/girl, no need to involve the police or the courts ? NONE !

Yet we see today that their are certain UN-NAMED MPs are extremely unhappy about having to justify their expenses claims.

So, what can we make of this ?

As I see it these MPs are not in Politics to do the best for our country and it's people.
No, they are in it for their OWN GAIN.
Look at the state of our country, we are BROKE, FULL TO THE BRIM WITH IMMIGRANTS BOTH LEGAL AND ILLEGAL, MASS UNEMPLOYMENT DUE TO IMMIGRANTS TAKING BRITISH JOBS, FOREIGN GANSTERS, HEROIN AND COCAINE DRUG CARTELS RUN BY IMMIGRANTS, BRITISH PATIENTS BEING DENIED DRUGS DUE TO COST, DISCRIMINATION AGAINST THE INDIGENOUS BRITISH etc, etc.


And what do our MPs do about this ? NOTHING. The only thing they care about is themselves and what they can get out of it.


WHY ARE WE NOT ALLOWED TO KNOW WHO THESE MPs ARE ? Only one has been named and that is New Labours vulgar DENIS MACSHANE.

LET THE ELECTORATE KNOW WHO THESE MPs ARE SO THAT THEY WILL NOT VOTE FOR THEM AGAIN.


Monday 23 August 2010

This Is Britain 2043 - Please Vote BNP NOW✔

Another very hard hitting and thought provoking video by SperoPatria's.

(click on the "WATCH ON YOUTUBE")

AN ENJOYABLE AND INFORMATIVE WEEKEND

I'm slowly recovering after returning from our Summer School last night.
The event was held in an idyllic setting which I last visited 7 years ago. Then I had difficulty in finding it and only found the location by following the density of the police presence.
This time it was EASY with sat nav getting us to within 300 yards after which we looked for security at the gate. How times have changed.
A full programme of lectures was available and much was learnt aboput election practice, financial matters and local activism.
Marlene Guest from Yorkshire gave an account of how local activism and exposing inefficiencies and plain corruption can help in getting increased support and our message across as proved by the high BNP votes in Rotherham.
Nick Griffin was at his best both in his opening and closing speeches (both of which I have recorded) and they gave us new enthusiasm after the disruption of the ill advised leadership challenge.

The new marquee donated by the chairman and Andrew Brons was only just large enough to accomodate all those there and during a heavy shower it was only by cramming closer we were able to avoid getting wet.
Fortunately apart from that the weather favoured us and we were able to mingle with members from other areas and exchange ideas and experiences in a sunny field in between sessions.
There was a feeling of purpose and unity and a determination to put past disagreements behind us and move on, and we left invigorated but tired.
We are a party, more united than ever now that those who have brought our party into disrepute (State agents?), or empire builders have left.
Hopefully those who were duped by these people will see the error of their ways and join us in the struggle for our country and it's future.

That systems are in place to improve our position we were left in no doubt and over the next months these will bear fruit, aided by our sense of purpose engendered over the week end.

All in all a VERY enjoyable and informative occasion made even better by renewing acquaintances with old friends from other areas.

Wanted - Mystic, Psychic, Mind-Reader,Seer,Telepathist,Diviner, Medium or Spiritualist To Help The Greater Manchester Police

Greater Manchester Police are on the look-out for a terrifying gang who struck repeatedly in Wigan town centre in the early hours of Saturday August 14th.

Although only now coming to light the police are appealing for help in catching the "gang of thugs."

A 27-year-old man was threatened and had his Apple iPhone and cash stolen in Wallgate, near to the junction with Haig Street, at 3.50am on Saturday, August 14.

A 19-year-old man was then attacked, and had his Nokia X6 phone taken in King Street, at around the same time.

Officers are investigating a third incident when a 40-year-old man was brutally attacked by three men in the gardens of Wigan Parish Church, just off Bishopgate and Hallgate, at around 4.30am.


The full report can be viewed by clicking on this link:


But, it's in the closing paragraph that the GMP are asking for your help with this appeal:


Quote:Anyone with information is asked to call police in Wigan on 0161 856 7203 or the independent charity Crimestoppers, anonymously, on 0800 555 111.

And that's all we have to go on - so if you have a crystal ball at hand, can you let us know the attackers - height, age, accent/language spoken, clothing worn or anything else that might give us a bleeding clue!


Hmmmmmm....is it just me? Or, do you think they're deliberately holding certain information from us??

Of, course!

Saturday 21 August 2010

Socialist - My Arse!


The following report is what I've kindly lifted from the "Together We Are Strong" SOLIDARITY - The British Workers Union website. (click on the link)
Quote:
"The Rich List noted that Unite’s Derek Simpson is “on a cool £120,328, Dave Prentis of Unison on £127,436 and the RMT’s Bob Crow on £105,679.” Generous benefits include “pension contributions and payments towards housing to funding chauffeur-driven cars.”

It's a good little article!

"By the way..are you a member yet of the only union that really does keep to it's word of British Jobs for British Workers?"

Friday 20 August 2010

WE ARE NOT FOR SALE

What is the connection between Lord Ashcroft, David Rowland, Philip Green, Laski Mittal and Mr Tata?
These multi millionaires are but a few who subsidise or advise the Labour and Tory parties and have a massive influence on government policies.
These rich people live abroad and pay little or no taxes in our country but make huge profits, not always transparently in and from our country.
What do they have in common? They care more about their obscene profits than they do about Britain but yet are feted by our politicians.
There are many more such as the oligarch friends of the slimy Mandelson.
There is obviously little difference between the two major parties in their courting of these dubious characters.

To quote an old saying "The person who pays the piper calls the tune"
These multi millionaires are interested only in money and have no allegience to Britain, but their interests are put before those of our country because of their wealth.
The politicians dare not antagonise them or they will lose party funding or other favours, so they grant them privelidges which are to our detriment.

Thus immigrants are allowed to flood in for cheap labour. Global capitalism allows these leeches to buy our industries and set them up abroad while our people languish on the dole (paid for out of our taxes, they do not pay tax here).
The crowding of our cities with multitudes of different cultures and the attendant social strife does not bother them. It has no effect on their profits, and they mainly live abroad.
They are quite happy with no go areas in our cities where English people fear to tread as they have their own no go areas. In this country they live in gated compounds with tight security while the same applies to their tax havens abroad.
No danger of them being mugged or raped in our vibrant or diverse society, their security guards see to that.

I can understand they seek safety but we would like a bit of that but instead have the conflict of diversity thrust upon us with all the dangers that entails.
The rub is that our disintegrating society has been created because of their need to maximise their tax free profit.
The obscenity is that they have on account of their great wealth a stranglehold on our government policy. And we are supposed to be a democracy.
Elections are just a farce as our representitives (MPs) know that they dare not antagonise them.
This is the reason they try to destroy our party. Not because we are racist, we are not, we just seek to preserve our own country and culture, and what's wrong with that?
No, the reason they are so against us is because we seek a regime which puts us and our people first, and would never be corrupted by money, especially that which is made at the expense of our country.
We in other words are not for sale, and that is what they do not like.

That is why they have their subsidised lackeys (the misnamed UAF) always on hand to try to thwart us.

Another saying, "As ye sow so shall ye reap". In time when the chaos which their greedy antics will surely bring they will get their just deserts.
They possibly believe they will be safe in their tax havens but we are not alone and the people all over the world are at last stirring and it could be unpleasant. I hope they will see sense before it is too late. That is why I am a BNP member, to try to avert strife.

All we want is justice in our OWN land.

Eventually we will attain our goal.

WATCH THE RACIST LABOUR MP DIANE ABBOT SQUIRM !

Taken from the CENTRE FOR SOCIAL COHESIAN WEBSITE
Reproduced below is Douglas Murray's latest blog for the Daily Telegraph.



DIANE ABBOT - A REAL RACIST AT WORK !

Click anywhere on article for full posting -

Thursday 19 August 2010

Britain's First Woman Muslim MP Banned From Driving And Fined £1,250

Former aide to Ken Livingstone and Human Rights lawyer - charged MP Yasmin Qureshi.

From the Daily Mail: She had made history by being elected Britain's first Muslim woman MP three days earlier.
But before Yasmin Qureshi had a chance to start making laws, she was caught breaking one - and in her new constituency for good measure.

Should this vile woman, God forbid killed or injured anyone on the road whilst driving without insurance and showing a typical (of Labour MP's & muslims alike) scant regard for the law - just what "human rights" would the victim have had? Would her bent Westminster colleagues and other crooked lawyers come rushing to condemn her? I very much doubt it!

A softer report on the matter can be found here at the Bolton News link:

Staying in Bolton:

"English Not The Mother Tongue For Quarter Of Bolton Mums"


One last report from the Bolton News:

"Sex Assault Claim After Wanderers Stars Party"

Wednesday 18 August 2010

IS THIS ONE OF NEW LABOURS BENEFITS OF IMMIGRATION ?



To The Lib/Lab/Con - Is this what you have turned our country into, a country infested with IMMIGRANT DRUG FARMERS,HEROIN JIHADIS, FOREIGN PROSTITUTES AND PIMPS, MURDERERS OF THE INDIGENOUS POPULATION, WAR CRIMINALS, TERRORISTS, RACIST PEADOPHILES, RAPISTS, SADISTS, SERIAL KILLERS etc, etc etc...A HAVEN The CRIMINAL NUTTERS OF THE WORLD ?

When did WE allow the Lib/Lab/Con to do this ? When did we MANDATE them to do this ? In WHOSE manifesto was it in that this would be allowed ? When did the Lib/Lab/Con INFORM US, the INDIGENOUS POPULATION, that THEY were going to DESTROY US ?

WHY ARE WE (THE INDIGENOUS PEOPLE) ALLOWING THEM TO ?

ARE WE SUPPOSED TO BE PROUD OF MULTICULTURALISM ?

END IMMIGRATION NOW AND RESTORE PEACE, LAW AND ORDER AND PROSPERITY AND PRIDE TO OUR LAND AND PEOPLE.


ASHAMED OF MY COUNTRY

A 90-year-old veteran who worked as a driver for General Eisenhower during WWII was killed in a 'despicable' attack by a thief who robbed him of his bus pass and just £40.

Geoff Bacon died 11 weeks after he was jumped from behind as he entered his flat, before being bundled to the floor and punched in the face by a man demanding money.

The widower suffered a broken hip as his attacker ransacked his home of more than 40 years in Camberwell, south London, before escaping with the money and his bus pass....

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1304155/War-hero-90-dies-beaten-robbed-bus-pass-40.html



How many more like this go unreported every day ?

ANGRY IS NOT THE WORD.

MUSLIMS, ISLAMISTS AND TERROR DEMANDS.

Adapted from Dr. Peter Hammond's book: Slavery, Terrorism and Islam: The Historical Roots and Contemporary Threat

Islam is not a religion, nor is it a cult. In its fullest form, it is a complete, total, 100% system of life. Islam has religious, legal, political, economic, social, and military components. The religious component is a beard for all of the other components.

Islamization begins when there are sufficient Muslims in a country to agitate for their religious privileges.

When politically correct, tolerant, and culturally diverse societies agree to Muslim demands for their religious privileges, some of the other components tend to creep in as well.

Here's how it works:

As long as the Muslim population remains around or under 2% in any given country, they will be for the most part be regarded as a peace-loving minority, and not as a threat to other citizens. This is the case in:

United States -- Muslim 0.6%

Australia -- Muslim 1.5%

Canada -- Muslim 1.9%

China -- Muslim 1.8%

Italy -- Muslim 1.5%

Norway -- Muslim 1.8%

At 2% to 5%, they begin to proselytize from other ethnic minorities and disaffected groups, often with major recruiting from the jails and among street gangs. This is happening in:

Denmark -- Muslim 2%

Germany -- Muslim 3.7%

United Kingdom -- Muslim 2.7%

Spain -- Muslim 4%

Thailand -- Muslim 4.6%


From 5% on, they exercise an inordinate influence in proportion to their percentage of the population. For example, they will push for the introduction of halal (clean by Islamic standards) food, thereby securing food preparation jobs for Muslims. They will increase pressure on supermarket chains to feature halal on their shelves -- along with threats for failure to comply. This is occurring in:

France -- Muslim 8%

Philippines -- 5%

Sweden -- Muslim 5%

Switzerland -- Muslim 4.3%

The Netherlands -- Muslim 5.5%

Trinidad & Tobago -- Muslim 5.8%

At this point, they will work to get the ruling government to allow them to rule themselves (within their ghettos) under Sharia, the Islamic Law.The ultimate goal of Islamists is to establish Sharia law over the entire world.

When Muslims approach 10% of the population, they tend to increase lawlessness as a means of complaint about their conditions. In Paris , we are already seeing car-burnings. Any non-Muslim action offends Islam and results in uprisings and threats, such as in Amsterdam , with opposition to Mohammed cartoons and films about Islam. Such tensions are seen daily, particularly in Muslim sections in:

Guyana -- Muslim 10%

India -- Muslim 13.4%

Israel -- Muslim 16%

Kenya -- Muslim 10%

Russia -- Muslim 15%

After reaching 20%, nations can expect hair-trigger rioting, jihad militia formations, sporadic killings, and the burnings of Christian churches and Jewish synagogues, such as in:

Ethiopia -- Muslim 32.8%



At 40%, nations experience widespread massacres, chronic terror attacks, and ongoing militia warfare, such as in:

Bosnia -- Muslim 40%

Chad -- Muslim 53.1%

Lebanon -- Muslim 59.7%

From 60%, nations experience unfettered persecution of non-believers of all other religions (including non-conforming Muslims), sporadic ethnic cleansing (genocide), use of Sharia Law as a weapon, and Jizya, the tax placed on infidels, such as in:

Albania -- Muslim 70%

Malaysia -- Muslim 60.4%

Qatar -- Muslim 77.5%

Sudan -- Muslim 70%

After 80%, expect daily intimidation and violent jihad, some State-run ethnic cleansing, and even some genocide, as these nations drive out the infidels, and move toward 100% Muslim, such as has been experienced and in some ways is on-going in:

Bangladesh -- Muslim 83%

Egypt -- Muslim 90%

Gaza -- Muslim 98.7%

Indonesia -- Muslim 86.1%

Iran -- Muslim 98%

Iraq -- Muslim 97%

Jordan -- Muslim 92%

Morocco -- Muslim 98.7%

Pakistan -- Muslim 97%

Palestine -- Muslim 99%

Syria -- Muslim 90%

Tajikistan -- Muslim 90%

Turkey -- Muslim 99.8%

United Arab Emirates -- Muslim 96%



100% will usher in the peace of 'Dar-es-Salaam' -- the Islamic House of Peace. Here there's supposed to be peace, because everybody is a Muslim, the Madrasses are the only schools, and the Koran is the only word, such as in:

Afghanistan -- Muslim 100%

Saudi Arabia -- Muslim 100%

Somalia -- Muslim 100%

Yemen -- Muslim 100%

Unfortunately, peace is never achieved, as in these 100% states the most radical Muslims intimidate and spew hatred, and satisfy their blood lust by killing less radical Muslims, for a variety of reasons. 'Before I was nine, I had learned the basic canon of Arab life. It was me against my brother; me and my brother against our father; my family against my cousins and the clan; the clan against the tribe; the tribe against the world, and all of us against the infidel. -- Leon Uris, 'The Haj'



It is important to understand that in some countries, with well under 100% Muslim populations, such as France, the minority Muslim populations live in ghettos, within which they are 100% Muslim, and within which they live by Sharia Law. The national police do not even enter these ghettos. There are no national courts, nor schools, nor non-Muslim religious facilities. In such situations, Muslims do not integrate into the community at large. The children attend madrasses. They learn only the Koran. To even associate with an infidel is a crime punishable with death. Therefore, in some areas of certain nations, Muslim Imams and extremists exercise more power than the national average would indicate.

Today's 1.5 billion Muslims make up 22% of the world's population. But their birth rates dwarf the birth rates of Christians, Hindus, Buddhists, Jews, and all other believers. Muslims will exceed 50% of the world's population by the end of this century.


Well, boys and girls, today we are letting the fox guard the henhouse.

The wolves will be herding the sheep!

Obama appoints two devout Muslims to Homeland Security posts. Doesn't this make you feel safer already?

Obama and Janet Napolitano appoint Arif Alikhan, a devout Muslim, as Assistant Secretary for Policy Development.

DHS Secretary Janet Napolitano swore in Kareem Shora, a devout Muslim who was born in Damascus , Syria , as ADC National Executive Director as amember of the Homeland Security Advisory Council (HSAC).


NOTE: Has anyone ever heard a new government official being identified as a devout Catholic, a devout Jew or a devout Protestant...? Just wondering.

Devout Muslims being appointed to critical Homeland Security positions?

Doesn't this make you feel safer already??

That should make the US ' homeland much safer, huh!!

Was it not "Devout Muslim men" that flew planes into U.S. buildings 8 years ago?

Was it not a Devout Muslim who killed 13 at Fort Hood ?

Also: This is very interesting and we all need to read it from start to finish. Maybe this is why our American Muslims are so quiet and not speaking out about any atrocities. Can a good Muslim be a good American?

This question was forwarded to a friend who worked in Saudi Arabia for 20 years. The following is his reply:

Theologically - no . . . Because his allegiance is to Allah, The moon God of Arabia

Religiously ? no? Because no other religion is accepted by His Allah except Islam (Quran, 2:256)(Koran)

Scripturally - no? Because his allegiance is to the five Pillars of Islam and the Quran.

Geographically ? no? Because his allegiance is to Mecca , to which he turns in prayer five times a day.

Socially - no? Because his allegiance to Islam forbids him to make friends with Christians or Jews..

Politically - no?Because he must submit to the mullahs (spiritual leaders), who teach annihilation of Israel and destruction of America, the great Satan.

Domestically - no? Because he is instructed to marry four Women and beat and scourge his wife when she disobeys him (Quran 4:34)

Intellectually - no? Because he cannot accept the American Constitution since it is based on Biblical principles and he believes the Bible to be corrupt.

Philosophically - no? Because Islam, Muhammad, and the Quran do not allow freedom of religion and expression..

Democracy and Islam cannot co-exist. Every Muslim government is either dictatorial or autocratic.

Spiritually - no? Because when we declare 'one nation under God,' the Christian's God is loving and kind, while Allah is NEVER referred to as Heavenly father, nor is he ever called love in The Quran's 99 excellent names.

Therefore, after much study and deliberation....

Perhaps we should be very suspicious of ALL MUSLIMS in this country. - - - They obviously cannot be both 'good' Muslims and good Americans.

Call it what you wish, it's still the truth. You had better believe it. The more who understand this, the better it will be for our country and our future. The religious war is bigger than we know or understand.

Can a muslim be a good soldier???

Army Maj. Nidal Malik Hasan, opened fire at Ft. Hood and Killed 13. He is a good Muslim!!!

Footnote: The Muslims have said they will destroy us from within.

SO FREEDOM IS NOT FREE.

THE MARINES WANT THIS TO ROLL ALL OVER THE U.S
--------------------------------

Thanks to Barry for sending this.

1984 by George Orwell / Nineteen Eighty-Four / Film Movie

Animal Farm

Tuesday 17 August 2010

RISING PRICES OF FOOD AND INFLATION.


JUST A QUICK LOOK AT THE RISING PRICES OF FOOD

SOYLENT GREEN ANYONE ?

Taken from todays Telegraph -

Over 9 billion people are expected to inhabit the planet by 2050 and the challenge of providing them with enough food to live without destroying the environment is increasingly tough.

Dr Philip Thornton, of the International Livestock Research Institute in Nairobi, said: “One [solution] is artificial meat, which is made in a giant vat.”

He added that another could be the use of nanotechnology, or molecular engineering, to deliver medication to livestock, which could increase their efficiency.

Other answers put forward were: increased yields from plants due to higher levels of the carbon dioxide in the atmosphere on which they feed; genetic modification; lowering food waste by encouraging people only to buy what they will use; or by developing food technology so agriculture produces less greenhouse gases.

However, some scientists warned that progress could be hindered by the amounts of information being controlled by some big multinationals in the sector, such as Monsanto.

Professor Jenifer Piesse, an international business expert at King’s College, London, said: “This represents a threat to the global commons in agricultural technology on which the green revolution has depended.”

The suggestions were presented in a range of papers published by the Royal Society, the Guardian reported.

The newspaper noted that more than one in seven people in the world do not have enough protein and energy.



Can we trust anything and anyone these days ?
We also have BIG PHARMA pushing drugs that do more damage than the illness prescribed for.
Cloning of DEAD animals for the food chain.
Etc, etc.

Since food was Globalised all we see as a result is OBESITY.
Maybe this "NEW FOOD" is some type of SOYLENT GREEN" and made out the fat removed from liposuction, the insides of real breasts (which have been removed and replaced with a plastic bag filled with chemicals) with added animal lips, eyes, ears, noses, tails etc.
How is anyone with plastics tits ever going to be able to breast feed ?

Somehow I don't feel hungry anymore.

THE POLICE SERVICE?

The police SERVICE is having to make severe cuts to save money in these times of austerity.
So most PCSOs woll go. So no more urgent phone calls to summon help when a child is drowning and waiting to tell the police where to recover the body from.
No longer will we see these diminutive people walking in pairs down quiet country roads to reassure the locals that all is well and they are safe.

Many traffic cops are being made to re apply for the reduced number of jobs available in future so in the event of an accident on the motorway it will be up to an hour before a policeman arrives.
Some cops are already trying to improve their prospects of employment by stepping up the fight against crime, in the only way they know "ticking boxes".

Two weeks ago on the East Lancs road a contractor, a young lad who had fought for his country and working hard for a living was stopped for a routine check by the Customs and Excise assisted by the police.
Fair enough they were checking for red diesel and the roadworthiness of the vehicle.
The policeman looked all over the vehicle and could find nothing wrong. All was in order and he had spent his time and been unable to tick a box. AND THEN Eureka he found something.
The drivers seatbelt had a small cut in it a quarter of an inch wrong. This was so small the vehicle had passed 2 MOTs with it but no matter instead of warning the young man to get it fixed the cop put a STOP notice on it.


Now the lad depends on the vehicle for his job and was unable to get a replacement belt for 2 weeks so he lost business.He also had to have another MOT and in all the "infringement" cost him hundreds of pounds in lost earnings.
The severity of the infringement was not severe enough to merit a fine and in a scale of severity of offence going from "A" to "C" where "A" is the most severe and "C" is the least he was given a "D".
After all this and getting the belt renewed and another MOT he then had to find a police station which would rescind the "Stop" notice.

The good news, the cop got to tick his box and convince his thick PC bosses of the work he had one for road safety, and thus keep his job.

Other protected parts of the police are the "Gay Lesbian and Transgender" departments together with their backup staff as well as the various "Ethnic" associations.
Money of course will be available to celebrate gay and ethnic events.

Something will have to give and it will be in areas of less importance such as robbery, assault and serious motorway accidents while serious crimes such as calling ethnics and homosexual names will be enforced with vigour as well as those minor technical vehicular "crimes" which have no bearing on safety such as cuts in seatbelts and numberplates with the wrong spacings.

No wonder the police have lost the respect of the people.
However it is not the average cop's fault, it it the fault of their PC university bosses with their Social Science degrees (hardly of more value than media studies) who dictate the framework in which the police now work.

The police "Service" is like the government rotten from the top and held increasingly in disdain by the people, and until we get root and branch change in both our country will never improve.

yaz